The Complaint Submission Process delineated within POTOLO's Complaint Handling Policy encompasses a diverse array of channels through which Users may lodge their grievances or express dissatisfaction with the services provided by the Company's app-based platform. These channels are strategically designed to offer Users multiple avenues for communication, thereby ensuring accessibility and convenience in submitting complaints. Specifically, Users are afforded the following channels for lodging complaints:

• 2.1.1. In-App Complaint Portal: The primary channel for complaint submission is the designated complaint portal integrated within the Company's mobile application. This portal provides Users with a streamlined interface for articulating their grievances directly within the app environment, thereby facilitating seamless interaction and expeditious processing of complaints.
• 2.1.2. Email Correspondence: Users may opt to submit their complaints via email correspondence to the Company's designated customer service email address. This channel offers Users the flexibility to articulate their grievances in a formal written format, thereby enabling detailed elucidation of concerns and facilitating comprehensive documentation for subsequent investigation and resolution.
• 2.1.3. Direct Contact with Customer Service Representatives: Alternatively, Users may opt to communicate their complaints directly to customer service representatives employed by the Company. This channel allows for real-time interaction and personalized assistance in articulating and addressing User grievances, thereby fostering a sense of responsiveness and attentiveness to User concerns.
• 2.1.4. Dedicated Hotline: For urgent or critical complaints necessitating immediate attention, Users may utilize the Company's dedicated hotline (if any made available by the Company) for lodging their grievances. This channel ensures prompt escalation and expeditious resolution of urgent issues, thereby mitigating potential disruptions to User experience and fostering trust in the Company's commitment to addressing User concerns in a timely manner.

Upon receipt of a complaint through any of the aforementioned channels, the Company undertakes a systematic process to ensure the timely and accurate capture of User grievances. Complaints are promptly logged into the Company's centralized complaint management system, wherein they are assigned unique identifiers for tracking and monitoring purposes. The receipt of complaints is meticulously documented, capturing essential details such as the nature of the complaint, date and time of submission, contact information of the User, and any pertinent supporting documentation provided by the User.

Acknowledgment of complaints serves as a critical component of the Complaint Submission Process, reaffirming the Company's commitment to acknowledging and addressing User grievances in a prompt and courteous manner. Upon receipt of a complaint, Users are promptly notified of its receipt through their preferred communication channel, be it within the app interface, via email correspondence, or through direct contact with customer service representatives. This acknowledgment communication provides Users with reassurance that their concerns have been duly noted and are undergoing investigation and resolution by the Company's dedicated complaint handling team. Additionally, Users are provided with an estimated timeframe for resolution and advised of any further steps or information required for the expeditious handling of their complaint.

The Complaint Investigation process within POTOLO's Complaint Handling Policy commences with a meticulous Initial Assessment of the complaint received, aimed at determining the nature, scope, and severity of the grievance articulated by the User. This preliminary evaluation is conducted promptly upon receipt of the complaint and involves a thorough review of the complaint details, including but not limited to the nature of the issue raised, relevant supporting documentation provided by the User, and any pertinent contextual information necessary for understanding the underlying circumstances surrounding the complaint. The Initial Assessment serves as the foundational step in the investigative process, enabling the Company to triage complaints effectively and allocate appropriate resources for their expeditious resolution.

Following the Initial Assessment, the Complaint Investigation process entails the systematic Gathering of Relevant Information pertinent to the resolution of the complaint at hand. This phase involves the collection and collation of all pertinent data, evidence, and documentation essential for conducting a thorough and objective investigation into the merits of the complaint. Information gathering efforts may encompass a variety of sources, including, but not limited to, internal records and logs, communication transcripts with the User, transaction history within the app interface, and any additional documentation provided by the User to substantiate their grievance. The meticulous gathering of relevant information ensures that the investigative process is founded upon a comprehensive understanding of the facts and circumstances surrounding the complaint, thereby facilitating informed decision-making and resolution.

Central to the Complaint Investigation process is the assignment of Priority Levels to individual complaints based on their perceived severity, urgency, and impact on User experience. Priority levels serve as a mechanism for triaging complaints and allocating resources in accordance with the level of priority assigned. Complaints may be categorized into distinct priority tiers, ranging from low to high, with corresponding response and resolution timeframes commensurate with the severity of the complaint. Factors considered in the assignment of priority levels may include the potential financial or reputational implications for the Company, the degree of inconvenience experienced by the User, and any regulatory or compliance considerations relevant to the complaint. The systematic assignment of priority levels ensures that complaints are addressed in a timely and equitable manner, with due consideration given to the urgency of resolution based on the circumstances of each individual case.

Integral to the Complaint Investigation process is proactive Communication with Complainants, aimed at fostering transparency, empathy, and trust throughout the resolution process. Upon initiation of the investigation, Users are promptly notified of the commencement of the investigative process and provided with regular updates on the status and progress of their complaint. Communication with complainants is conducted through their preferred communication channel, be it within the app interface, via email correspondence, or through direct contact with customer service representatives. Additionally, Users are afforded the opportunity to provide any further clarification or additional information relevant to their complaint, thereby ensuring their active involvement and participation in the resolution process. Effective communication with complainants serves to demonstrate the Company's commitment to addressing User grievances in a responsive and customer-centric manner, thereby enhancing User satisfaction and retention.

The Complaint Resolution process within POTOLO's Complaint Handling Policy is underpinned by a commitment to expeditiously address and resolve User grievances within predefined timeframes. Resolution Timeframes are established to ensure timely and efficient handling of complaints, thereby minimizing User inconvenience and demonstrating the Company's dedication to prompt redressal of concerns. Upon receipt of a complaint, the Company endeavors to adhere diligently to the following resolution timeframes:

• 4.1.1. Initial Acknowledgment: Upon receipt of a complaint, Users are promptly acknowledged within [INSERT NUMBER] hours to confirm receipt of their grievance and provide an initial assessment of the expected timeframe for resolution.
• 4.1.2. Investigation Period: Following the initial acknowledgment, complaints are systematically investigated with due diligence and expediency. The investigation period may vary depending on the complexity and severity of the complaint; however, the Company aims to complete the investigative process within [INSERT NUMBER] days of receipt of the complaint.
• 4.1.3. Resolution Period: Upon completion of the investigation, the Company endeavors to resolve the User's complaint and provide a satisfactory outcome within [INSERT NUMBER] days of initiating the investigation. This timeframe encompasses the implementation of appropriate remedial measures, communication of the resolution to the User, and any necessary follow-up actions to ensure User satisfaction.
• 4.1.4. Escalation Timeframes: In cases where complaints necessitate escalation to higher levels of authority or management within the Company, escalation timeframes are established to facilitate timely intervention and resolution. Escalated complaints are addressed with expedited priority, with resolution efforts prioritized within [INSERT NUMBER] days of escalation.

The Complaint Resolution process encompasses a variety of Resolution Methods aimed at addressing User grievances effectively and restoring confidence in the Company's services. Resolution methods may include, but are not limited to, the following:

• 4.2.1. Corrective Action: Where feasible, the Company undertakes corrective action to rectify the underlying issue giving rise to the User's complaint. This may involve remedial measures such as refunding erroneous charges, reprocessing orders affected by service disruptions, or implementing system enhancements to prevent recurrence of similar issues in the future.
• 4.2.2. Compensation: In cases where Users have experienced significant inconvenience or adverse impact as a result of the Company's actions or omissions, compensation may be offered as a gesture of goodwill. Compensation may take various forms, including monetary refunds, service credits, or complimentary upgrades, commensurate with the nature and severity of the complaint.
• 4.2.3. Alternative Solutions: In situations where direct resolution of the User's complaint is not feasible or practical, the Company explores alternative solutions aimed at mitigating the User's dissatisfaction and addressing their underlying concerns. This may involve offering alternative service options, facilitating access to comparable service providers, or providing personalized assistance to identify suitable alternatives based on the User's preferences and requirements.
• 4.2.4. Communication and Follow-up: Throughout the resolution process, open and transparent communication with the User is maintained to keep them informed of the progress and status of their complaint. Following resolution, the Company conducts follow-up communication with the User to ensure satisfaction with the outcome and address any residual concerns or additional assistance required.

In instances where Users have experienced tangible harm or loss as a result of the Company's actions or omissions, Compensation or Remedies may be extended as part of the resolution process. Compensation or remedies are provided as a means of redressing the User's grievances and restoring their trust and confidence in the Company's services. The determination of appropriate compensation or remedies is guided by principles of fairness, equity, and proportionality, taking into account the nature and severity of the harm suffered by the User. Compensation or remedies may include, but are not limited to, monetary reimbursement for financial losses incurred, provision of complimentary services or upgrades, issuance of service credits or vouchers for future use, or any other form of restitution deemed appropriate in the circumstances. The Company endeavors to ensure that compensation or remedies provided are commensurate with the extent of the User's inconvenience or detriment, thereby demonstrating a commitment to equitable resolution and customer satisfaction.

The Escalation Procedure outlined within POTOLO's Complaint Handling Policy is guided by predefined Criteria for Escalation, which serve as objective benchmarks for determining when complaints warrant escalation to higher levels of authority or management within the Company. Escalation criteria are established to ensure that complaints requiring heightened attention or specialized intervention are promptly identified and addressed, thereby safeguarding against undue delays in resolution and mitigating potential risks to User satisfaction and retention. The following criteria inform the decision-making process for escalation:

• 5.1.1. Severity of the Complaint: Complaints deemed to pose significant risk or detriment to User satisfaction, reputation, or compliance with regulatory requirements may warrant escalation. Severity may be assessed based on factors such as the magnitude of financial loss incurred by the User, the extent of service disruption experienced, or the potential legal or reputational implications for the Company.
• 5.1.2. Complexity of the Issue: Complaints characterized by complexity, ambiguity, or multifaceted underlying issues may necessitate escalation to ensure thorough investigation and resolution. Complexity may arise from factors such as technical intricacies, conflicting evidence, or cross-functional dependencies requiring specialized expertise or resources for resolution.
• 5.1.3. Recurrence or Pattern of Complaints: Complaints exhibiting a pattern of recurrence or systemic issues may indicate underlying deficiencies in service delivery or operational processes, warranting escalation to address root causes and implement corrective action. Recurrent complaints may signal broader systemic issues requiring strategic intervention and oversight at higher levels of management.
• 5.1.4. User Impact and Expectations: Complaints that significantly impact User experience, satisfaction, or expectations may merit escalation to ensure timely and effective resolution in alignment with User expectations. Factors such as the perceived impact on User trust, loyalty, or long-term retention may influence the decision to escalate complaints to higher levels of authority within the Company.

The Internal Escalation Process delineated within POTOLO's Complaint Handling Policy encompasses a structured framework for escalating complaints within the Company's organizational hierarchy, thereby facilitating timely intervention and resolution by designated escalation points. Internal escalation procedures are designed to ensure hierarchical oversight and accountability in addressing User grievances, with escalation points defined based on the severity and complexity of the complaint. The following steps comprise the Internal Escalation Process:

• 5.2.1. Tiered Escalation Levels: The Internal Escalation Process incorporates tiered escalation levels, delineating hierarchical points of escalation within the Company's organizational structure. Escalation levels may include frontline customer service representatives, team leads or supervisors, departmental managers, and executive leadership, with escalation pathways determined based on the severity and nature of the complaint.
• 5.2.2. Escalation Triggers: Internal escalation triggers are predefined criteria or thresholds that prompt escalation of complaints to higher levels of authority or management within the Company. Escalation triggers may be based on factors such as the severity of the complaint, established resolution timeframes, or specific thresholds for financial or reputational risk.
• 5.2.3. Escalation Protocols: Each escalation level within the Internal Escalation Process is accompanied by predefined escalation protocols, outlining roles, responsibilities, and communication channels for escalating and addressing User complaints. Escalation protocols ensure clear lines of accountability and facilitate seamless coordination and collaboration among stakeholders involved in the resolution process.
• 5.2.4. Escalation Documentation: All escalations within the Internal Escalation Process are meticulously documented, capturing essential details such as the nature of the complaint, reasons for escalation, actions taken, and resolutions implemented. Escalation documentation serves as a record of escalation history and facilitates post-resolution analysis and continuous improvement efforts.

The Documentation of Complaints entails the systematic recording, tracking, and maintenance of detailed records pertaining to all User grievances received by POTOLO. Upon receipt of a complaint, comprehensive documentation is initiated, capturing essential information including but not limited to:

• User's identifying information, such as name, contact details, and account information.
• Nature and specifics of the complaint, including relevant dates, times, and description of the issue raised.
• Supporting documentation provided by the User, such as screenshots, emails, or transaction records.
• Correspondence and communication logs documenting interactions between the User and POTOLO's customer service representatives throughout the complaint resolution process.

These records are maintained in a secure and accessible manner, ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and compliance with applicable data protection regulations. The documentation of complaints serves as a critical resource for analysis, trend identification, and continuous improvement efforts aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of POTOLO's complaint-handling processes.

Reporting Mechanisms encompass structured processes for generating, disseminating, and analyzing reports related to User complaints within POTOLO's operations. Reporting mechanisms serve multiple purposes, including:

• Monitoring key performance indicators (KPIs) related to complaint resolution, such as average response times, resolution rates, and User satisfaction scores.
• Identifying trends, patterns, and recurring issues across complaints to inform strategic decision-making and process improvement initiatives.
• Facilitating internal communication and accountability by providing stakeholders with timely and relevant information on the status and outcomes of complaint resolution efforts.

POTOLO employs a variety of reporting mechanisms, including automated reporting tools, dashboard analytics, and periodic review meetings, to ensure that relevant stakeholders have access to actionable insights derived from complaint data. These reporting mechanisms enable proactive identification of areas for improvement and facilitate data-driven decision-making to enhance the overall quality of service delivery.

Continuous Improvement constitutes an ongoing commitment to enhancing POTOLO's complaint handling processes through iterative analysis, refinement, and optimization. This sub-clause outlines the following key elements of POTOLO's approach to continuous improvement:

• 6.3.1. Regular Review and Analysis: POTOLO conducts periodic reviews and analyses of complaint data to identify root causes, trends, and areas for improvement. These reviews inform targeted interventions and process enhancements aimed at addressing systemic issues and enhancing the effectiveness of complaint resolution efforts.
• 6.3.2. Stakeholder Feedback and Engagement: POTOLO may actively solicit feedback from internal stakeholders, such as customer service representatives, operational teams, and senior management, as well as external stakeholders, including Users and regulatory authorities. This feedback is leveraged to gain insights into User expectations, identify pain points in the complaint-handling process, and prioritize improvement initiatives accordingly.
• 6.3.3. Implementation of Corrective Actions: Based on the findings of reviews and analyses, POTOLO implements targeted corrective actions and process improvements to address identified deficiencies and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of complaint resolution efforts. These actions may include updates to policies and procedures, enhancements to technological infrastructure, and additional training and development initiatives for staff members.
• 6.3.4. Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: POTOLO continuously evaluates the performance of its complaint handling processes against established benchmarks and industry best practices. By benchmarking performance metrics against peer organizations and industry standards, POTOLO identifies opportunities for further optimization and strives to achieve excellence in complaint resolution and customer satisfaction.

POTOLO provides robust Opt-in and Opt-out Mechanisms within its app-based platform to afford Users control over their communication preferences. These mechanisms enable Users to make informed decisions regarding their willingness to receive text messages and communications from POTOLO. The Opt-in mechanism allows Users to voluntarily subscribe to receiving text messages and communications by providing explicit consent through affirmative action, such as checking a designated box or providing a written confirmation. Conversely, the Opt-out mechanism empowers Users to revoke their consent and cease receiving text messages and communications by opting out through easily accessible and User-friendly channels within the app interface. POTOLO ensures that the Opt-in and Opt-out Mechanisms are prominently displayed, clearly articulated, and readily accessible to Users, thereby facilitating transparency and adherence to User preferences.

POTOLO adopts a systematic approach to the Handling of Communication Preferences in accordance with the 10DLC requirement. Upon User registration or interaction with POTOLO's app-based platform, Users are provided with the opportunity to specify their communication preferences, including their consent to receive text messages and communications from POTOLO. Users are afforded the flexibility to modify their communication preferences at any time through intuitive and User-friendly controls embedded within the app interface. POTOLO maintains comprehensive records of User communication preferences, ensuring accurate and up-to-date management of User opt-in and opt-out requests. Any changes to communication preferences made by Users are promptly reflected in POTOLO's communication systems, thereby respecting User choices and preferences with regard to receiving text messages and communications. Additionally, POTOLO employs robust security measures to safeguard the integrity and confidentiality of User communication preferences, adhering to stringent data protection standards and regulatory requirements to mitigate risks associated with unauthorized access or disclosure. By adhering to the provisions outlined in Clause 7 of this Complaint Handling Policy, POTOLO demonstrates its unwavering commitment to compliance with the 10DLC requirement and its dedication to respecting User privacy, preferences, and regulatory obligations. POTOLO continually monitors and evaluates its opt-in and opt-out mechanisms to ensure effectiveness, efficiency, and alignment with evolving regulatory standards and industry best practices. Through transparent and accountable management of User communication preferences, POTOLO upholds the highest standards of integrity, trustworthiness, and User-centricity in its operations.

POTOLO prioritizes Staff Training on Complaint Handling to equip employees with the requisite knowledge, skills, and resources to effectively manage User complaints in accordance with established policies and procedures. Training initiatives are designed to foster a thorough understanding of POTOLO's complaint-handling processes, including but not limited to:

• Identification and classification of User complaints based on severity, complexity, and impact on User satisfaction.
• Procedures for receiving, documenting, and escalating User complaints in a timely and efficient manner.
• Techniques for conducting thorough and impartial investigations into User grievances, including gathering relevant information and evidence.
• Resolution methods and strategies for addressing User concerns, facilitating satisfactory outcomes, and promoting User retention.
• Compliance requirements, including adherence to regulatory standards, data protection protocols, and the 10DLC requirement pertaining to communication preferences.

Staff training sessions are conducted regularly and encompass diverse learning modalities, including interactive workshops, role-playing exercises, and online modules, tailored to the specific needs and roles of different employee groups within POTOLO. Training content is regularly updated to reflect changes in complaint handling procedures, regulatory requirements, and industry best practices, ensuring that employees remain abreast of the latest developments and equipped to deliver exceptional service to POTOLO's Users.

POTOLO is committed to Promoting Customer Awareness regarding its complaint handling processes, User rights, and available recourse mechanisms to enhance transparency, trust, and User confidence in POTOLO's services. The following strategies are employed to promote customer awareness:

• Clear Communication: POTOLO ensures that information regarding its complaint handling processes, including how to submit a complaint, expected resolution timeframes, and available channels for escalation, is communicated clearly and conspicuously to Users through various touchpoints, including the app interface, website, and customer communications.
• Educational Resources: POTOLO provides educational resources, such as FAQs, User guides, and informational articles, to educate Users about their rights and responsibilities in the event of a complaint. These resources outline the steps Users can take to escalate their concerns, seek redress, and provide feedback on POTOLO's complaint handling performance.
• User Feedback Mechanisms: POTOLO solicits User feedback on its complaint handling processes through surveys, feedback forms, and interactive forums, enabling Users to voice their opinions, express concerns, and suggest areas for improvement. User feedback is actively monitored and utilized to refine POTOLO's complaint handling procedures and enhance the overall User experience.
• Transparency and Accountability: POTOLO maintains a Policy of transparency and accountability in its interactions with Users, openly acknowledging and addressing User complaints, and providing regular updates on the status and progress of complaint resolution efforts. By fostering a culture of openness and accountability, POTOLO seeks to instill confidence and trust in its User community and demonstrate its commitment to customer satisfaction and retention.

POTOLO adheres to stringent protocols for the Handling of Personal Information collected during the complaint handling process, ensuring compliance with applicable data protection laws and regulations. The following measures govern the handling of personal information:

• Collection and Consent: POTOLO collects and processes personal information from Users solely for the purpose of addressing and resolving complaints submitted through its app-based platform. Users provide explicit consent for the collection and processing of their personal information as part of the complaint submission process, with clear disclosures regarding the purposes and intended uses of their data.
• Lawful Basis and Transparency: POTOLO processes personal information in accordance with lawful bases permitted under applicable data protection laws, such as consent, contractual necessity, or legitimate interests. The Company maintains transparency regarding its data processing activities, providing Users with access to detailed privacy notices outlining the types of personal information collected, the purposes of processing, and their rights regarding their data.
• Minimization and Accuracy: POTOLO adopts measures to minimize the collection and retention of personal information to the extent necessary for complaint resolution purposes. The Company ensures that personal information collected is accurate, up-to-date, and relevant to the resolution of User complaints, with mechanisms in place for Users to update or correct their information as needed.
• Security and Confidentiality: POTOLO implements robust technical and organizational security measures to protect personal information against unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, or destruction. These measures include encryption, access controls, regular security audits, and employee training on data security best practices. POTOLO maintains strict confidentiality obligations regarding the handling of personal information and limits access to authorized personnel involved in the complaint handling process.

POTOLO employs comprehensive Confidentiality Measures to safeguard the privacy and confidentiality of User complaints and personal information throughout the complaint handling process. The following measures are implemented to uphold confidentiality:

• Confidentiality Policies: POTOLO establishes clear and enforceable confidentiality policies and procedures governing the handling, storage, and transmission of User complaints and personal information. These policies outline the obligations of employees to maintain confidentiality and the consequences of unauthorized disclosure or breach of confidentiality.
• Access Controls: POTOLO restricts access to User complaints and personal information to authorized personnel on a need-to-know basis, implementing role-based access controls and authentication mechanisms to ensure that only authorized individuals have access to sensitive data.
• Non-disclosure Agreements: POTOLO requires employees and third-party service providers involved in the complaint-handling process to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), committing them to maintain the confidentiality of User complaints and personal information. NDAs specify the obligations of parties to protect confidential information and provide remedies for breaches of confidentiality.
• Confidentiality Training: POTOLO conducts regular training sessions for employees on confidentiality best practices, data protection principles, and the importance of safeguarding User privacy. Training initiatives emphasize the significance of confidentiality in maintaining User trust and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

POTOLO undertakes regular Policy Reviews to assess the adequacy, efficacy, and compliance of its Complaint Handling Policy. These reviews are conducted at predetermined intervals and may be triggered by significant changes in business operations, regulatory mandates, or feedback from stakeholders. Key elements of regular Policy reviews include:

• Comprehensive Assessment: POTOLO conducts a comprehensive assessment of its Complaint Handling Policy, examining each clause and sub-clause to identify any gaps, inconsistencies, or areas for improvement. This assessment encompasses an evaluation of the Policy's clarity, relevance, and effectiveness in guiding complaint handling processes and promoting customer satisfaction.
• Regulatory Compliance: POTOLO ensures that its Complaint Handling Policy remains in full compliance with relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards governing complaint management, data protection, and User privacy. Any updates or amendments to regulatory requirements are promptly incorporated into the Policy to mitigate compliance risks and ensure legal adherence.
• Performance Evaluation: POTOLO evaluates the performance of its complaint handling processes against established key performance indicators (KPIs) and User feedback metrics to assess their effectiveness in achieving desired outcomes. Performance data, including complaint resolution times, User satisfaction scores, and escalation rates, is analyzed to identify trends, patterns, and areas for improvement.
• Stakeholder Engagement: POTOLO may solicit feedback from internal stakeholders, including employees involved in complaint handling, as well as external stakeholders, such as Users and regulatory authorities, to gather insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the Complaint Handling Policy. Stakeholder feedback is instrumental in identifying opportunities for Policy enhancement and ensuring alignment with User expectations and regulatory requirements.

POTOLO is committed to Incorporating Feedback and Changes into its Complaint Handling Policy to address identified deficiencies, enhance operational efficiency, and promote continuous improvement. The following steps are taken to incorporate feedback and changes:

• Analysis of Feedback: POTOLO conducts a thorough analysis of stakeholder feedback received during Policy reviews, focusing on identifying recurring themes, actionable recommendations, and areas of consensus or divergence. Feedback is categorized, prioritized, and documented for consideration in Policy revisions.
• Collaboration and Consultation: POTOLO may foster collaboration and consultation among cross-functional teams, including legal, compliance, customer service, and technology, to develop consensus-based solutions for addressing feedback and implementing Policy changes. Multidisciplinary input ensures that proposed revisions are practical, feasible, and aligned with organizational objectives.
• Documentation and Communication: POTOLO documents all revisions to the Complaint Handling Policy in a clear, transparent, and accessible manner, ensuring that stakeholders are informed of changes and understand their implications. Updated Policy documents are disseminated to relevant personnel and made available for reference through internal communication channels.
• Implementation and Monitoring: POTOLO implements revised Policy provisions in a phased manner, providing adequate training and support to employees affected by the changes. The implementation process is closely monitored to identify any operational challenges or unintended consequences arising from Policy revisions, with adjustments made as necessary to optimize effectiveness and compliance. Read Less...